Research standards for a global record.
Every article should help readers distinguish documented events, interpretation, recollection, disputed claims and work still underway.
1. Place and time
Identify the geographic scope and historical period. Distinguish a single institution, city or country from a region or transnational network. Avoid plotting a symbolic research region as though it were a known exact historic site.
2. Source status
Prefer contemporaneous records, original code, manuals, minutes, primary interviews and institutional archives when available. Museum essays, policy reports and secondary scholarship are clearly identified as such. Record links, publication dates and any known archival identifier.
3. Languages and translation
Retain original-language titles, scripts, names and terminology where possible. Attribute translations. Flag interpretive ambiguity, transcription uncertainty and variants in transliteration. Invite corrections from language-community specialists.
4. Attribution and labor
Distinguish a person’s named role, a collective’s credited work, an institution’s funding, and technology purchased or adapted locally. Do not infer sole authorship from fame, a patent, a company press release, or the presence of a museum exhibit.
5. Historical contestation
Competing claims must describe their supporting evidence and any disagreement about definitions—for example, whether “first” means proposed, demonstrated, shipped, publicly accessible or widely adopted. Do not use false balance when the available evidence strongly favors one account.
6. Public revisions
Material factual changes receive a dated revision note that identifies what changed and why. Routine punctuation fixes need not produce a public edition. Revisions should not silently erase consequential previous assertions.
7. Contributor safety and privacy
Do not publish personal contact information, confidential testimony or identifying material without appropriate permission. Future moderated submissions will require rate limiting, review, spam protection and data retention safeguards.
8. AI-assisted research
AI tools may support discovery or drafting, but are not sources of historical evidence. Editors must verify claims against accessible original material or attributed secondary research. Never invent citations, interviews or archival holdings.
Methods, version 1.0
Published 2026-10-09. The standards are open to evidence-based public criticism and will be versioned as research practices develop.